SynthesisLangenbeck's archives of surgery2026
Optimal duration of perioperative antibiotics in radical cystectomy and urinary diversion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Perioperative and peri-interventional antibiotic prophylaxis: general and urology-specific recommendations from the German Interdisciplinary S3 guideline].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the impact of extended versus nonextended perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) on reducing postoperative complications and hospital stays in patients undergoing radical cystectomy and urinary diversion.
methodsWe conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for studies comparing short-term (≤ 24 h) and extended (≥ 24 h) PAP in patients undergoing radical cystectomy and urinary diversion. The primary outcomes were surgical site infections (SSIs), urinary tract infections (UTIs), and length of hospital stay. The statistical analysis was performed via RevMan version 5.3. The results are presented as risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs). Results are presented as risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs). The quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE methodology.
resultsA total of 214 studies were screened. Four studies involving 680 patients were included. No significant differences were detected between short-term and extended PAP in terms of SSIs (RR = 0.71 [95% CI 0.43-1.17]; P = 0.18]), febrile UTIs (RR = 1.19 [95% CI 0.91-1.56]; P = 0.20]), or length of hospital stay (MD = 0.76 days [95% CI [-2.72, 4.25]; P = 0.67]).
conclusionNo significant difference was observed between 24-h and extended PAP for reducing postoperative complications after radical cystectomy and urinary diversion. Short-term PAP is a reliable and effective strategy and is recommended as the standard practice for reducing antimicrobial resistance and improving postoperative outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.