ArticleRevista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)2026
Evaluation of aortic stiffness with an oscillometric arteriograph device in patients with hypertension and ascending aortic aneurysm.
Article in Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comment on "Evaluation of aortic stiffness with an oscillometric arteriograph device in patients with hypertension and ascending aortic aneurysm".Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2026Article
- Aortic stiffness in patients with hypertension and ascending aortic aneurysm.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to compare central blood pressure, central pulse pressure, and parameters like augmentation index and pulse wave velocity, which are used to evaluate arterial stiffness using an oscillometric method called arteriography, among hypertensive patients with and without concomitant ascending aortic aneurysms.
methodsThis research was conducted as a single-center and prospective study. A total of 83 patients were included in this study, including 44 consecutive patients with hypertension diagnosed and an ascending aortic diameter of 40 mm or more detected by 2D transthoracic echocardiography, and 39 controls with hypertension diagnosed and a normal ascending aortic diameter.
resultsE/e' ratio was found to be significantly higher in the aneurysm group (9.05±2.24 vs. 7.75±1.94, p<0.05). The difference between peripheral and central systolic blood pressures was found to be significantly lower in the aneurysm group compared to the control group (9.3±4.5 vs. 11.8±4.1, p<0.05, respectively). Among the examined arterial stiffness parameters, augmentation index values were significantly higher in the aneurysm group (27±8.7 vs. 22.7±9.6, p<0.05), while pulse wave velocity did not show a statistically significant difference between the groups (8.85±1.85 vs. 8.59±1.19, p>0.05, respectively).
conclusionOur study suggests that a potential relationship between the development of ascending aortic aneurysm and elevated aortic stiffness in hypertensive patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.