ReviewThe Korean journal of pain2026
Evaluating efficacy of pregabalin in diabetic peripheral neuropathy pain management.
Review in The Korean journal of pain, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to define the efficacy of pregabalin in treating neuropathic pain in diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN), both as a monotherapy and in combination with other drugs that are commonly used to treat DPN in a clinical setting. Thus, physicians are able to make more informed decisions when choosing drugs to relieve DPN. Studies found on PubMed and Embase were evaluated for the role of pregabalin in DPN pain management, as well as its efficacy in comparison to other treatments. Search terms included "pregabalin," "diabetic," "peripheral," "neuropathy," and "pain." Experimental groups varied from amitriptyline, duloxetine, carbamazepine, venlafaxine, and Xiaoketongbi Formula (XF). Pregabalin was shown to have no difference when compared to amitriptyline; however, longer treatment regimens should be performed. Duloxetine is more effective at lower dosages, but pregabalin is more effective at higher dosages. Additionally, pregabalin was found to be more effective than carbamazepine and venlafaxine. Surprisingly, XF was found to be as effective as pregabalin, demonstrating a potential role of herbal treatments. Combination therapies did not have a significant advantage over pregabalin monotherapy in treating DPN. In terms of adverse effects, pregabalin was more tolerated among patients, though side effects were generally mild. Pregabalin remains an effective option for DPN pain management and is considered noninferior to current monotherapies and combination therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.