Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41540115›Full record

ReviewNature protocols2026

iTP-seq: a scalable profiling workflow to characterize bacterial translation landscapes in vitro.

Mélanie Gillard, Thibaud T Renault, C Axel Innis

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Approaches for Studying Context Specificity of Translation Inhibitor Action.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mélanie Gillard *Univ. Bordeaux, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, ARNA, UMR 5320, U1212, Bordeaux, France.
Thibaud T Renault *Univ. Bordeaux, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, ARNA, UMR 5320, U1212, Bordeaux, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1530-2613
C Axel InnisUniv. Bordeaux, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, ARNA, UMR 5320, U1212, Bordeaux, France. axel.innis@inserm.fr.ORCID 0000-0003-3153-9490

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (French National Research Agency) ANR-22-CE11-0012-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uneven translation rates resulting from mRNA context, tRNA abundance, nascent amino acid sequence or various external factors play a key role in controlling the expression level and folding of the proteome. Inverse toeprinting coupled to next-generation sequencing (iTP-seq) is a scalable in vitro method for characterizing bacterial translation landscapes, complementary to ribosome profiling (Ribo-seq), a widely used method for determining transcriptome-wide protein synthesis rates in vivo. In iTP-seq, ribosome-protected mRNA fragments known as inverse toeprints are generated by using RNase R, a highly processive 3' to 5' RNA exonuclease. Deep sequencing of these fragments reveals the position of the leading ribosome on each mRNA with codon resolution, as well as the full upstream coding regions translated by these ribosomes. Consequently, the method requires no a priori knowledge of the translated sequences, enabling work with fully customizable transcript libraries rather than previously sequenced genomes. As a standardized framework for inverse toeprint generation, amplification and sequencing, iTP-seq can be used in combination with different types of libraries, in vitro translation conditions and data-analysis pipelines tailored to address a range of biological questions. Here, we present a robust protocol for iTP-seq and show how it can be integrated into a broader workflow to enable the study of context-dependent translation inhibitors, such as antibiotics. The time required to complete this workflow is ~10 d, and the workflow can be carried out by an experienced molecular biologist, with data analysis also requiring a working knowledge of command-line tools and Python scripts.

Indexed as

BacteriaHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingProtein BiosynthesisRibosome ProfilingRibosomesRNA, MessengerWorkflowRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.