Evidence mapPaperPMID 41540203Full record

ReviewPediatric research2026

Neonatal neuroplasticity and metaplasticity: bridging neuroscience to clinical practice.

Efe Sahinoglu, Emily Lo, Amr El Shahed, Linh G Ly, Brian T Kalish, Mehmet N Cizmeci

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Efe SahinogluGenetics and Genome Biology Program, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Emily LoDivision of Neonatology, The Hospital for Sick Children, and Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Amr El ShahedDivision of Neonatology, The Hospital for Sick Children, and Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Linh G LyDivision of Neonatology, The Hospital for Sick Children, and Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Brian T KalishProgram in Neuroscience and Mental Health, SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, Canada.
Mehmet N CizmeciDivision of Neonatology, The Hospital for Sick Children, and Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. mehmet.cizmeci@sickkids.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroplasticity, the brain's adaptive ability to restructure and reorganize itself, represents one of the most fascinating aspects of the developing brain. Neuroplasticity is maximal during the "first 1000 days" (conception through two years of life), presenting both unique opportunities and vulnerabilities. While neonatal neurology often focuses on the "symptomatic minority" presenting early after birth, there remains an "unrecognized majority" of children who will present with disorders later in childhood. For clinicians working with newborns and young infants, a comprehensive understanding of developmental principles provides the foundation for knowledge to optimize early intervention strategies. This review focuses on the biological basis of neuroplasticity and metaplasticity in the neonatal brain, as well as their role in neurodevelopment. We examine how the "dynamic neural exposome" (the full mix of biological and environmental influences the brain is exposed to over time) and "toxic stressor interplay" (the combined effect of multiple stressors such as pain, infection, and inflammation) influence these processes, often leading to "ontogenetic adaptations" (short-term survival-driven changes in brain wiring that may have long-term consequences). We outline mechanisms shaping early brain development, describe how early experiences and interventions influence outcomes, and emphasize prioritizing prevention over later rescue to improve neurodevelopmental outcomes. IMPACT: The article provides a high-level framework that links the brain's response to experience and injury directly to clinical implications in neonatology, expanding the focus to the "first 1000 days". The effectiveness of interventions hinges on their timing relative to developmental critical and sensitive periods, alongside the dynamic interplay between genetic and environmental influences (including the Maternal-Placental-Fetal triad) on brain development. Neuroplasticity presents both a window for recovery and adaptation, and a susceptibility to adverse experiences, emphasizing the need for evidence-based neuroprotective and neurodevelopmental care that prioritizes preventive approaches to improve long-term outcomes.

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.