ArticleBMC oral health2026
Perioperative knowledge needs in maxillofacial trauma patients: a cross-sectional survey.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Correction: Perioperative knowledge needs in maxillofacial trauma patients: a crosssectional survey.BMC oral health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMaxillofacial trauma poses a growing public health burden worldwide, yet the perioperative knowledge needs of affected patients are poorly understood across different demographic groups. This study aimed to evaluate the perioperative knowledge needs in patients with maxillofacial trauma across different demographic groups, while re-evaluating the reliability and validity of the research instrument.
methodA cross-sectional survey was conducted among 469 maxillofacial trauma patients at a tertiary stomatology hospital in Sichuan, using convenience sampling. Structural validity of the questionnaire was assessed via exploratory factor analysis (EFA), while reliability was evaluated through internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) and split-half reliability. Non-parametric tests (Kruskal-Wallis H and Mann-Whitney U) were employed for inferential analysis.
resultsThe cohort comprised 64.2% (301/469) male participants, 77.4% (363/469) of whom were aged 16 years or younger. EFA revealed a six-dimensional structure that explained 69% of the variance. The questionnaire demonstrated strong reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.889, split-half = 0.780). Significant variations in knowledge needs were observed across the perioperative stages (p < 0.001). Age significantly influenced needs relating to routine postoperative care (p < 0.001), medications/secondary care (p < 0.005), and scar prevention/treatment (p < 0.001).
conclusionThe knowledge needs of patients vary significantly according to their demographics, peaking during the first week after surgery. This highlights the importance of personalized patient education during the early stages of recovery.
trial registrationClinical Trial Registration No. ChiCTR2300079287, Registration Date 29 December 2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.