ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2026
Cross-modal synchronization of EEG and ECG reveals hidden signatures of recovery in traumatic brain injury.
Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate assessment of traumatic brain injury (TBI) is critical for customization of neurorehabilitation treatments and clinical decision-making. Existing monitoring approaches either rely on subjective evaluation or isolated physiological signals, limiting real-time responsiveness and multimodal insight. This study introduces a novel framework integrating electroencephalography (EEG) and electrocardiography (ECG) to explore heart-brain synchronization as a biomarker for neurological state in TBI patients. We first define a synchronization metric using EEG delta power and heart rate variability (HRV), capturing both the degree and direction of synchronization. A two-stage contrastive learning approach is then proposed: Clinically Consistent Contrastive Learning (CCCL) leverages clinical metrics to guide positive sample selection, while Multimodal Heart-brain Contrastive Learning (MHCL) aligns synchronization features with clinical outcomes. Applied to long-term ICU recordings, the proposed approach identifies distinct synchronization patterns associated with recovery trajectories. Although the sample size (N=11) is expected to be extended, this work offers an exploratory, proof-of-concept demonstration of heart-brain synchronization as a potential real-time biomarker for neurophysiological recovery in severe TBI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.