ArticleImplementation science communications2026
Adaptation of a cardiovascular quality improvement initiative for worksite health centers: application of the ADAPT-ITT framework.
Article in Implementation science communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEvidence-based quality improvement (QI) interventions and strategies often require adaptation before implementation in new settings. The goal of this study was to describe the adaptation process of QI strategies from an evidence-based cardiovascular initiative, previously tested in community-based primary care clinics, for use in worksite health centers (WHC). Participating WHCs were located at large manufacturing plants. The adapted QI strategies were offered as part of the Healthy Hearts in Manufacturing initiative.
methodsOur team followed the ADAPT-ITT framework to adapt the QI strategies for twelve randomly selected WHCs. Meetings were held with WHC leaders, and semi-structured interviews were conducted with WHC clinicians and staff to understand current workflows and identify contextual factors that could help or hinder the implementation of the QI strategies. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Adaptations were then identified and developed by clinical experts and a practice facilitator, with input from an Advisory Panel. Proposed adaptations were shared with WHC leaders and clinicians for feedback before implementation protocols were finalized.
resultsPhase 1 (Assessment) showed that manufacturing communities had high rates of heart disease and its risk factors. Four QI interventions from the Million Hearts campaign were selected for implementation using evidence-based QI strategies during Phase 2 (Decision). Phase 3 (Administration) revealed helpful implementation factors, including strong patient-clinician relationships and leadership support, as well as hindering factors, including deficiencies of electronic health records systems, high staff turnover, and poor patient adherence to treatment. These factors informed the Phase 4 (Production) development of implementation materials, for example, tailored blood pressure measurement protocols and patient educational tools. During Phase 5 (Topical experts), clinicians and WHC leaders provided feedback on the adaptations, which were then integrated in Phase 6 (Integration) into a flexible implementation protocol for the practice facilitator. The final phase (Testing) is ongoing.
conclusionThis study describes the adaptation process of a primary care cardiovascular QI initiative to meet the unique clinical settings of WHCs. The findings suggest that with contextual adaptation of QI strategies, WHCs have the potential to implement evidence-based interventions to improve cardiovascular care, providing insights for future initiatives in non-traditional clinical care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.