Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41540507›Full record

ArticleCell communication and signaling : CCS2026

In situ mapping of activated PDGFRβ defines a prognostic discrepancy between histological subtypes of NSCLC.

Amanda Lindberg, Louise Hellberg, Anaïs Grandon, Hui Yu, Viktoria Thurfjell, Erik Wåhlén, Neda Hekmati, Max Backman, Axel Cederholm, Artur Mezheyeuski and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell communication and signaling : CCS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Amanda LindbergDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Louise HellbergDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Anaïs GrandonDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Hui YuDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Viktoria ThurfjellDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Erik WåhlénDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Neda HekmatiDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Max BackmanDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Axel CederholmDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Artur MezheyeuskiMolecular Oncology Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain.
Anna KlemmBioImage Informatics Unit, Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Information Technology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Johan BotlingDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Agata Zieba WicherNavinci Diagnostics AB, Uppsala, Sweden.
Patrick Micke *Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Carina Strell *Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. carina.strell@igp.uu.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreased stromal Platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta (PDGFRβ) expression is a hallmark of the desmoplastic tissue reaction in cancer and marks subsets of cancer-associated fibroblasts, pericytes, and smooth muscle cells. However, its functional status in situ has been anticipated from static expression measures, which cannot determine whether high receptor abundance reflects active signaling.

methodsWe established two second-generation proximity ligation assays (PLAs) to quantify PDGFRβ activation in the in situ environment of human lung cancer by detecting either phosphorylated PDGFRβ or its interaction with the adaptor protein Grb2. The immunofluorescence-based assays were applied to tissue-microarrays including diagnostic samples from over 600 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

resultsIn lung cancer tissue, activation scores correlated with PDGFRβ expression but revealed a more nuanced receptor status, indicating variable activation despite similar expression levels. Higher PDGFRβ activation was associated with increased recurrence risk exclusively in squamous cell carcinoma, a finding not captured by conventional immunohistochemistry. This activation was accompanied by a specific stromal profile enriched for LRRC15- and FAP-positive cells, a pattern absent in adenocarcinomas.

conclusionPDGFRβ activation status provides functional information beyond receptor expression, uncovering clinically relevant, otherwise overlooked, stromal phenotypes. The approach illustrates the diagnostic potential of functional protein assays in the era of precision medicine.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsReceptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor betaFemaleHumansPhosphorylationPrognosisPDGFRB protein, humanReceptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor beta

Identifiers

PMID41540507
PMCPMC12849303

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.