ArticleJournal of health psychology2026
Barriers and facilitators of engagement with app-based pain self-management strategies among chronic pain patients (CPPs).
Article in Journal of health psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Systematic evaluation of commercially available pain-management mHealth apps for chronic pain in the United Kingdom.British journal of health psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explored barriers and facilitators to digital self-management engagement among individuals with chronic pain. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 24 participants, guided by a 32-item schedule informed by digital health adoption literature and the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behaviour (COM-B) model. Reflexive thematic analysis identified key influences on engagement, which were then mapped onto the COM-B framework to inform intervention design. Barriers were linked to physical and cognitive limitations, information access, financial constraints, self-efficacy and individual differences. Facilitators included social connection, enhanced pain awareness, autonomy and accessibility. While themes aligned with most COM-B components, no clear influences were mapped to Automatic Motivation. Findings provide nuanced insights into the behavioural and contextual factors shaping engagement with app-based interventions. By applying the COM-B model, this study offers a theoretically grounded understanding of digital self-management uptake, supporting the development of more responsive and accessible interventions for people living with chronic pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.