Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41540820›Full record

ArticleMedical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making2026

Target Trial Emulation to Incorporate Real-World Data in the Estimation of the Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of Biologic Treatment.

Janharpreet Singh, Matt Stevenson, Kimme L Hyrich, Clare L Gillies, Keith R Abrams, Sylwia Bujkiewicz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Janharpreet SinghBiostatistics Research Group, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0272-3902
Matt StevensonSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Kimme L HyrichNIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Trust, Manchester, UK.
Clare L GilliesLeicester Real World Evidence Unit, Leicester Diabetes Centre, Leicester General Hospital, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Keith R AbramsDepartment of Statistics, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Sylwia BujkiewiczBiostatistics Research Group, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3003-9403

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IntroductionIn the health technology assessment (HTA) of biologic treatments for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), there is limited randomized evidence on treatment effectiveness after first-line treatment failure. We demonstrate how real-world data (RWD) could fill this evidence gap.MethodsTarget trial emulation (TTE) minimizes biases in the causal analysis of RWD by prespecifying a protocol for a hypothetical randomized clinical trial (RCT) that would estimate the effect of interest. The application of TTE for HTA was illustrated using RWD from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for Rheumatoid Arthritis to estimate the effectiveness of rituximab versus nonbiologic therapy (NBT) after first-line biologic failure, in terms of European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology response achievement. The effectiveness estimates from RWD were combined with RCT estimates in a meta-analysis. The pooled estimates were entered into an economic model to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) comparing biologic versus NBT strategies.ResultsBased on RWD, rituximab was associated with higher probabilities of achieving a moderate or good response (0.215 v. 0.174) and a good response (0.090 v. 0.066) as compared with NBT. These probabilities were lower than those estimated from RCT data (moderate or good 0.650; good 0.150). The economic model estimated less time on treatment and lower costs associated with biologics when based on RWD compared with RCT data (mean £63,500 v. £70,000). This resulted in a higher ICER based on RWD compared with RCT data (mean £46,800 v. £34,700 per quality-adjusted life-year gained).ConclusionsRWD can provide supplemental evidence on treatment effectiveness where randomized evidence is limited. This can make a meaningful difference to cost-effectiveness estimates. Our results are not intended to inform current RA management.HighlightsIn health technology assessment, real-world data (RWD) can provide supplemental evidence on treatment effectiveness where there is limited randomized evidence.Target trial emulation was applied using RWD to estimate the clinical effectiveness of biologic treatment; these estimates were combined with estimates from an RCT in a meta-analysis, and the pooled estimates were entered into an economic model for rheumatoid arthritis.Treatment effect estimates based on combining RWD and RCT data were more modest compared with the effectiveness estimates from the RCT data alone, leading to a difference in the estimate of cost-effectiveness comparing biologics with nonbiologic therapy.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidBiological ProductsCost-Benefit AnalysisCost-Effectiveness AnalysisHumansModels, EconomicQuality-Adjusted Life YearsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRituximabTechnology Assessment, BiomedicalAntirheumatic AgentsBiological ProductsRituximabhealth technology assessmentreal-world datarheumatoid arthritistarget trial emulation

Identifiers

PMID41540820
PMCPMC12976101

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.