ArticleJournal of diabetes research2026
Risk Factors and Pregnancy Outcomes of Twin Pregnancies With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Comparison Based on Chorionicity.
Article in Journal of diabetes research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early pregnancy fasting plasma glucose and risk factors: impact on gestational diabetes mellitus and other adverse perinatal outcomes in singleton and twin pregnancies.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Risk Factors and Pregnancy Outcomes of Twin Pregnancies With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Comparison Based on Chorionicity.Journal of diabetes research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There is insufficient evidence to determine whether the risk factors and pregnancy outcomes associated with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in twin pregnancies vary by chorionicity. Materials: A retrospective cohort study was conducted among twin pregnancies. GDM was diagnosed using the IADPSG diagnostic criteria. Logistic regression and generalized estimation equation (GEE) models were used to identify the risk factors of GDM and its impact on pregnancy outcomes, stratified by monochorionic (MC) and dichorionic (DC) pregnancies. Results: Advanced maternal age (MC: aOR 2.18, 95% CI 1.25-3.81 and DC: aOR 1.32, 95% CI 1.06-1.67) and preexisting hypertension (MC: aOR 2.69, 95% CI 1.04-9.36 and DC: aOR 1.70, 95% CI 1.12-2.59) were risk factors for GDM regardless of chorionicity. Overweight (aOR 1.65, 95% CI 1.26-1.98), obesity (aOR 2.31, 95% CI 1.43-3.74), multiparity (aOR 1.43, 95% CI 1.10-1.88), assisted reproductive technology (ART) use (aOR 1.75, 95% CI 1.36-2.26), and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) (aOR 1.98, 95% CI 1.37-4.12) were risk factors for GDM only in DC pregnancies. GDM was only associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia in MC pregnancies (aOR 1.29, 95% CI 1.04-2.26). GDM was associated with an increased risk of preterm delivery (PTD) at < 37 (aOR 1.13, 95% CI 1.05-1.34) and < 34 gestational weeks (aOR 1.15, 95% CI 1.07-1.75) in DC pregnancies. Conclusion: The risk factors and pregnancy outcomes associated with GDM in twin pregnancies vary by chorionicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.