Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41541526›Full record

ArticleArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2025

Seven-Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging Has Increased Sensitivity but Decreased Specificity in Diagnosing Cartilage Defects in the Knee Compared With 1.5- and 3-Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Andrew George, Karen L Hernandez, Bradley Lambert, Haley M Goble, Nakul Gupta, Patrick C McCulloch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrew GeorgeDepartment of Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
Karen L HernandezDepartment of Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
Bradley LambertDepartment of Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
Haley M GobleDepartment of Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
Nakul GuptaDepartment of Radiology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
Patrick C McCullochDepartment of Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the accuracy of 7-Tesla (T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared with standard-of-care (SOC) 1.5- or 3-T MRI in detecting and grading cartilage defects in the knee. Methods: Participants who already underwent SOC MRI at 1.5- or 3-T and provided consent were scheduled for 7-T MRI prior to arthroscopy for all indications except revision surgery. SOC and 7-T MRI scans were independently reviewed in randomized order by 2 blinded musculoskeletal radiologists using a modified Outerbridge classification system for defect grading. Image quality (sharpness, contrast, artifact, noise) was also rated. At the time of arthroscopy, each articular surface was then graded by the surgeon, who was blinded to the 7-T MRI scans. Using arthroscopy as the gold standard, we calculated the sensitivity and specificity of SOC MRI and 7-T MRI, as well as inter-rater reliability. Results: A total of 81 patients-41 female patients (aged 45 ± 14 years) and 40 male patients (aged 40 ± 14 years)-were enrolled. The average time between SOC and 7-T MRI was 69 days, and the average time between 7-T MRI and surgery was 6 days. Sharpness, contrast, and noise ratings were all significantly improved with 7-T MRI compared with SOC MRI ( Conclusions: Seven-Tesla MRI showed improved imaging quality metrics and increased sensitivity but decreased specificity in diagnosing cartilage defects in the knee compared with SOC 1.5- and 3-T MRI using arthroscopy as the gold standard. Level of Evidence: Level II, prospective comparative diagnostic accuracy study.

Identifiers

PMID41541526
PMCPMC12800811

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.