Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41541882›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in stroke2025

Anodal tDCS and virtual reality gait rehabilitation in individuals with chronic stroke: a case series report.

Aracely Marks, Shelley Oliveira Barbosa, Daniella Napoli, Susan E D'Andrea

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in stroke, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aracely MarksMotion VR Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, United States.
Shelley Oliveira BarbosaMotion VR Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, United States.
Daniella NapoliMotion VR Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, United States.
Susan E D'AndreaMotion VR Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Stroke is a principal cause of long-term disability worldwide, significantly impairing motor function, including gait and mobility. Conventional physical therapy, primarily focusing on repetitive, task-specific exercises, often falls short in addressing the complex rehabilitative needs of stroke survivors. Emerging technologies such as virtual reality (VR) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have shown potential to enhance neuroplasticity and functional recovery, suggesting that their combined use could offer a novel pathway for stroke rehabilitation. Objective: This study evaluated the efficacy of an integrated VR and tDCS treadmill training protocol in improving gait and mobility outcomes among individuals with chronic stroke. Methods: Five chronic stroke patients were recruited for this study. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either anodal tDCS or sham stimulation in conjunction with VR treadmill training. The anodal stimulation was targeted at the ipsilesional motor cortex, specifically over the primary motor cortex (M1) area corresponding to the C3/C4 locations in the 10-20 EEG system. The intervention consisted of 10 30-min sessions over 2 weeks. Clinical assessments, including the Dynamic Gait Index (DGI), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), 10-meter Walk Test (10MWT), and the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) were conducted pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, and at a 2-week follow-up. Results: All participants demonstrated improvements in the clinical measures post-intervention, irrespective of whether they received anodal tDCS or sham stimulation. Notably, clinically significant improvements, defined by an improvement greater or equal to the established minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs), were observed in DGI scores for four participants, suggesting enhanced gait functionality. Conclusion: The combined VR and tDCS interventions promise to improve gait and mobility in chronic stroke survivors. While the observed improvements were not distinctly attributed to tDCS, the role of VR training was notably beneficial. These preliminary findings underscore the potential of integrating emerging technologies in stroke rehabilitation and highlight the need for future research with larger cohorts to explore the distinct contributions of each modality and validate this integrative approach.

Indexed as

gaitrehabilitationstroketDCSvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID41541882
PMCPMC12802614

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.