Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41542102›Full record

ReviewJournal of orthopaedic translation2025

Can alternatives to animal testing yield useful information regarding biological mechanisms and drug discovery?

Qi Gao, Simon Kwoon-Ho Chow, Issei Shinohara, Masatoshi Murayama, Yosuke Susuki, Mayu Morita, Chao Ma, Stuart B Goodman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of orthopaedic translation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Development of ovine hepatic organoids: a powerfulFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Qi GaoOrthopaedic Research Laboratories, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94304, USA.
Simon Kwoon-Ho ChowOrthopaedic Research Laboratories, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94304, USA.
Issei ShinoharaOrthopaedic Research Laboratories, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94304, USA.
Masatoshi MurayamaOrthopaedic Research Laboratories, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94304, USA.
Yosuke SusukiOrthopaedic Research Laboratories, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94304, USA.
Mayu MoritaOrthopaedic Research Laboratories, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94304, USA.
Chao MaOrthopaedic Research Laboratories, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94304, USA.
Stuart B GoodmanOrthopaedic Research Laboratories, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94304, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Establish alternative strategies to standard animal experiments decrease animal utilization and simultaneously enhance the reliability of biological and disease models. This review highlights advancements in three areas: in vitro culture platforms, disease modeling, and in silico simulations. We first discuss the innovative in vitro approaches, including 2D coculture systems, 3D spheroids, organoids, and organ-on-chip models, which facilitate the creation of physiologically relevant environments. Then, we focus on cell selection and characterization in disease modeling, with a particular focus on bone fracture healing and inflammation. We further review the potential of in silico simulations, including molecular docking, machine learning (ML) approaches, and pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) modeling, to predict drug efficacy, interactions, and biological outcomes. These alternative strategies provide the potential for obtaining accurate and consistent results, thereby enhancing biomedical research and decreasing dependence on animal models. The Translational Potential of this Article: This review examines in vitro organoids, microphysiological systems, and computational models as alternatives to animal testing. These methods enhance our understanding of biological mechanisms. They also reduce the requirement for animal models. Ultimately, they help accelerate drug discovery that can directly benefit patients.

Indexed as

Disease modelingIn silico modelsMicrophysiological systems

Identifiers

PMID41542102
PMCPMC12799505

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.