SynthesisFrontiers in stroke2024
The impacts of new antidiabetic drugs on the risk of ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.
Synthesis in Frontiers in stroke, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: New classes of antidiabetic drugs reportedly lower the risk of cardiovascular events. This review summarizes the evidence for the effects of these drugs on the risk of stroke in diabetic individuals. Methods: Multiple databases that report stroke outcome data were scrutinized for clinical trials (from inception to June 25, 2023), compared sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2-Is), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs), and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4-Is), vs. other antidiabetic drugs and placebo. Results: Among the 960 identified trials, 259 satisfied the eligibility criteria. Among these, 177 and 82 trials reported at least one or no stroke events, respectively. In total, 208, 19, and 32 trials had a low, unclear, and high risk of bias, respectively. SGLT2-Is use did not decrease the risk of non-fatal hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke (risk ratio (RR) 0.96; 95% CI 0.87 to 1.06; Discussion: The use of GLP1-RAs, but not SGLT2-Is or DPP4-Is, may decrease non-fatal stroke risk. Considering these results, the findings may inform the treatment of diabetic people at risk of stroke and the design of new antidiabetic interventional trials. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42017067889, identifier 42017067889.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.