Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41542273›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in stroke2024

Brain volume is a better biomarker of outcomes in ischemic stroke compared to brain atrophy.

Kenda Alhadid, Robert W Regenhardt, Natalia S Rost, Markus D Schirmer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in stroke, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Quantifying brain health in acute ischemic stroke through effective reserve.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kenda AlhadidDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Robert W RegenhardtDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Natalia S RostDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Markus D SchirmerDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.

Funding

DISCOVERY - Statistics and Analysis CoreU19NS115388 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Steven M Greenberg, Natalia S Rost · 2019 to 2026
$75.4M
Neuroscience Resident Research ProgramR25NS065743 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI CASH, SYDNEY S, WILLIAMS, ZIV · 2009 to 2023
$11.8M
ERIS - Effective Reserve In StrokeR21AG083559 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI SCHIRMER, MARKUS D · 2023 to 2023
$454k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG083559NINDS NIH HHS R25 NS065743NINDS NIH HHS U19 NS115388
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to determine whether brain volume at the time of ischemic stroke injury is a better biomarker for predicting functional outcomes than brain atrophy. Background: Brain parenchymal fraction (BPF) has been used as a surrogate measure of global brain atrophy and a neuroimaging biomarker of brain reserve in studies evaluating clinical outcomes after brain injury. Brain volume itself is affected by natural aging, cardiovascular risk factors, and biological sex, among other factors. Recent studies have shown that brain volume at the time of injury can influence functional outcomes, with larger brain volumes being associated with better outcomes. Methods: Acute ischemic stroke cases at a single center between 2003 and 2011, with neuroimaging obtained within 48 h of presentation were eligible for the study. Functional outcomes represented by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days post-admission (mRS score ≤ 2 deemed a favorable outcome) were obtained through patient interviews or per chart review. Deep learning-enabled automated segmentation pipelines were used to calculate brain volume, intracranial volume, and BPF on the acute neuroimaging data. Patient outcomes were modeled through logistic regressions, and a model comparison was conducted using the Bayes information criterion (BIC). Results: A total of 467 patients with arterial ischemic stroke were included in the analysis, with a median age of 65.8 years and 65.3% of the participants being male. In both models, age and a larger stroke lesion volume were associated with worse functional outcomes. Higher BPF and a larger brain volume were associated with favorable functional outcomes; however, a comparison of both models suggested that the brain volume model (BIC = 501) better explains the data than the BPF model (BIC = 511). Conclusion: The extent of global brain atrophy (and its surrogate biomarker BPF) has been regarded as an important biomarker for predicting functional post-stroke outcomes and resilience to acute injury. In this study, we demonstrate that a higher global brain volume at the time of injury better explains favorable functional outcomes, which can be directly measured in a clinical setting.

Indexed as

arterial ischemic strokeBPFbrain parenchymal fractionbrain volumemodified Rankin ScalemRS

Identifiers

PMID41542273
PMCPMC12802764

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.