ReviewFrontiers in stroke2024
Clinical management of a ruptured intracranial aneurysm.
Review in Frontiers in stroke, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D printing in medicine: bridging imaging, education, and practice.Archives of medical sciences. Atherosclerotic diseases · 2025Article
- Current Concepts in the Management of Cerebral Aneurysms.Missouri medicineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intracranial hemorrhage due to a ruptured aneurysm is one of the most serious neurosurgical emergencies. The patient mostly presents with severe headaches and neurological deterioration. A rapid diagnosis and an interdisciplinary approach play a major role in the fate of these patients. The treatment can vary from endovascular to surgical and must be carefully and individually planned. Neurovascular expertise and an interdisciplinary approach are of vital importance and obligatory for the best possible outcome. Methods: In this narrative review, we scrutinize the current literature and discuss the actual data and guidelines in order to emphasize the importance of the interdisciplinary expertise and approach in patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysm. Results: The current approach to patients with ruptured aneurysm is inhomogeneous and often ineffective due to internal disputes between different disciplines. Although there is plenty of literature and hard evidence to "show the way," many still choose to base their decisions on personal experience or opinion. Conclusions: Every ruptured brain aneurysm should be approached in an interdisciplinary manor and treated according to the current evidence and guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.