Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41543893›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026

"Excluded phenotypes" restrict genetic paths toward adaptation in declining populations.

James S Andon, Charles D Kocher, Ken A Dill, Tina Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

James S Andon *Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706.ORCID 0000-0002-8471-2341
Charles D Kocher *Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794.ORCID 0000-0001-5032-5186
Ken A DillLaufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794.ORCID 0000-0002-2390-2002
Tina WangDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706.ORCID 0000-0001-7259-7449

Funding

John Templeton Foundation (JTF) 62564
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evolutionary rescue is the process by which declining populations adapt to conditions that would otherwise cause their extinction. Considering the spectrum of mutant phenotypes that can arise within a declining population, there exists the interesting case of mutations which improve fitness relative to the wild-type, but do not restore population growth. Here, we hypothesize that mutations within this phenotype space are functionally inaccessible to populations in decline and term it an "evolutionary excluded zone." We experimentally demonstrate that this excluded zone disallows certain mutational paths from causing evolutionary rescue in declining populations of M13 bacteriophage. We then integrate this observation into Fisher's Geometric Model to extrapolate it to other evolutionary rescue scenarios. Our findings indicate that the excluded zone significantly reduces the likelihood of evolutionary rescue by de novo mutation and that evolution is fundamentally different in declining populations than in ones that are constant or growing.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalBacteriophage M13Biological EvolutionModels, GeneticEvolution, MolecularMutationPhenotypeevolutionary rescueexcluded zoneGeometric ModelPACE

Identifiers

PMID41543893
PMCPMC12818411

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.