ArticlePloS one2026
Lack of social support associated with major depressive disorder in middle-aged and older adults from the United States: A propensity score-matched cohort study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveCurrent widely used depression assessment criteria may not accurately reflect the true prevalence of depression, and previous studies have insufficiently addressed the multidimensional nature of social support. Research on the relationship between depression and specific dimensions of social support remains limited, which impedes the targeted allocation of scarce social resources to mitigate the disease burden. This study aimed to explore the association between multi-dimensional social support and major depressive disorder (MDD) in the US population, using depression assessment criteria consistent with current epidemiological data.
methodWe analyzed data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). After propensity score matching (PSM), 123 participants with MDD (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score ≥15) and 543 without MDD were included. Social support was assessed using five-dimensional questionnaires and each dimension was dichotomously scored (1 = presence of support, 0 = absence of support), yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 5. Participants were categorized into three social support groups: Low group (0-1), Middle group (2-3), and High group (4-5). Logistic regression models were used to examine the association between social support and MDD, and subgroup analyses were performed to assess consistency across populations.
resultsCompared with participants without MDD, those with MDD had significantly lower proportions of adequate social support across all five dimensions. Binary logistic regression analyses showed that higher social support levels were associated with a reduced risk of MDD (Middle vs Low group: odds ratio [OR], 0.40; 95% CI, 0.22-0.73; P = 0.003; High vs Low group: OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.08-0.29; P < 0.001). Financial support exhibited the strongest inverse association with MDD, while adequate religious activity showed the weakest inverse association. The relationship between social support and MDD remained consistent across all subgroup analyses.
conclusionsIn brief, sufficient social support, especially financial support, was linked to a significantly lower risk of MDD among the middle-aged and elderly population in the United States.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.