Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41544710›Full record

ReviewAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2026

Limited Evidence of Benefits from Clinical Trials of Human-Identical Milk Oligosaccharides for Infants.

Rupak Shivakoti, Barbara Laughton, Jenna Mandell, Ana Barrios-Tascon, Reshma Rajendran, Richard Glashoff, Lars Bode, Grace Aldrovandi, Louise Kuhn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rupak ShivakotiDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States. Electronic address: rs3895@cumc.columbia.edu.
Barbara LaughtonDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Jenna MandellDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Ana Barrios-TasconGertrude H Sergievsky Center, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Reshma RajendranDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Richard GlashoffDivision of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Department of Pathology, National Health Laboratory Service, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
Lars BodeDepartment of Pediatrics, Larsson-Rosenquist Foundation Mother-Milk-Infant Center of Research Excellence Human Milk Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
Grace AldrovandiDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Louise KuhnDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States; Gertrude H Sergievsky Center, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs) are complex carbohydrates unique to human milk, and a wealth of observational and mechanistic studies indicate that HMOs are key to infant health by supporting gut microbiota and immune development. This review synthesizes evidence from randomized clinical trials evaluating whether supplementation with human-identical milk oligosaccharides (HiMOs), i.e., synthetic HMOs, in infants and young children improves health outcomes. We identified 12 randomized clinical trials: 8 in healthy infants, 3 in special populations of infants, and 1 in young children. We selected only trials with a randomized, parallel group design; most of the included trials also had an observational human milk-fed control group. The most widely evaluated HiMO was 2'-fucosyllactose used alone or in combination with other HiMOs. In some trials, other bioactive components were included in the control and/or intervention formula groups, complicating interpretation. All trials in healthy infants confirmed the noninferiority of HiMO-supplemented formula on growth and tolerability relative to control formula. Results were mixed with respect to reductions in morbidity, and all studies were underpowered for more severe morbidity outcomes. Stool microbiota and biomarkers of inflammation and gut function generally shifted in a direction closer to human milk-fed infants with HiMO intervention. Some growth improvements were noted in association with HiMO intervention in preterm infants and in infants with severe acute malnutrition. HiMO supplementation may be a promising intervention to improve child health, but due to the heterogeneity and limitations of the clinical trials that have been undertaken, many questions remain about the nature of the benefits and the specific populations who might benefit.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaMilk, HumanOligosaccharidesChild, PreschoolFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansInfantInfant FormulaInfant, NewbornPrebioticsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTrisaccharides2'-fucosyllactoseOligosaccharidesPrebioticsTrisaccharidesbreastfeedingbreastmilkchildrenHiMOsHMOhuman-identical milk oligosaccharideshuman milk oligosaccharidesinfectionmicrobiomemicrobiotaprebioticsrandomized trials

Identifiers

PMID41544710
PMCPMC12934283

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.