ReviewAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2026
Limited Evidence of Benefits from Clinical Trials of Human-Identical Milk Oligosaccharides for Infants.
Review in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Human-Identical Milk Oligosaccharides in Infant Formula: How Close Are We to Evidence-Based Benefit?Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- 2'-Fucosyllactose and its metabolites propionate/butyrate suppress inflammation through a shared TLR4/p38 MAPK-dependent pathwayCurrent research in food science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs) are complex carbohydrates unique to human milk, and a wealth of observational and mechanistic studies indicate that HMOs are key to infant health by supporting gut microbiota and immune development. This review synthesizes evidence from randomized clinical trials evaluating whether supplementation with human-identical milk oligosaccharides (HiMOs), i.e., synthetic HMOs, in infants and young children improves health outcomes. We identified 12 randomized clinical trials: 8 in healthy infants, 3 in special populations of infants, and 1 in young children. We selected only trials with a randomized, parallel group design; most of the included trials also had an observational human milk-fed control group. The most widely evaluated HiMO was 2'-fucosyllactose used alone or in combination with other HiMOs. In some trials, other bioactive components were included in the control and/or intervention formula groups, complicating interpretation. All trials in healthy infants confirmed the noninferiority of HiMO-supplemented formula on growth and tolerability relative to control formula. Results were mixed with respect to reductions in morbidity, and all studies were underpowered for more severe morbidity outcomes. Stool microbiota and biomarkers of inflammation and gut function generally shifted in a direction closer to human milk-fed infants with HiMO intervention. Some growth improvements were noted in association with HiMO intervention in preterm infants and in infants with severe acute malnutrition. HiMO supplementation may be a promising intervention to improve child health, but due to the heterogeneity and limitations of the clinical trials that have been undertaken, many questions remain about the nature of the benefits and the specific populations who might benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.