Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41545049›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Rationale and design of the REMECHOQUE multicentre registry protocol: evaluating therapeutic trends in cardiogenic shock.

Vicente Jimenez-Franco, Jahir Rodriguez Rivera, Carlos Jerjes-Sanchez, Mauricio Castillo Perez, Monica Flores Zertuche, Erasmo De La Peña, Guillermo Torre-Amione, Andres Gerardo Peña-Blade, Renata Quevedo-Salazar, Manuel Odin De Los Ríos and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Vicente Jimenez-FrancoInsert a comma after Monterrey, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Monterrey, Mexico.
Jahir Rodriguez RiveraInsert a comma after Monterrey, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Monterrey, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2748-4992
Carlos Jerjes-SanchezInstituto de Cardiología y Medicina Vascular, TecSalud, San Pedro Garza Garcia, Mexico carlosjerjes@tec.mx.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3222-7405
Mauricio Castillo PerezInsert a comma after Monterrey, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Monterrey, Mexico.
Monica Flores ZertucheInsert a comma after Monterrey, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Monterrey, Mexico.
Erasmo De La PeñaInsert a comma after Monterrey, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Monterrey, Mexico.
Guillermo Torre-AmioneInsert a comma after Monterrey, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Monterrey, Mexico.
Andres Gerardo Peña-BladeInsert a comma after Monterrey, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Monterrey, Mexico.
Renata Quevedo-SalazarInsert a comma after Monterrey, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Monterrey, Mexico.
Manuel Odin De Los Ríoschange C intead S= Obtencion, Consorcio Academico Consorcio Academico para la Obtencion de Datos Clinicos, Hospital Angeles, Culiacan, Mexico.
Alexandra Arias-MendozaInstituto Nacional de Cardiologia Ignacio Chavez, Mexico city, Mexico, Mexico.
Jose Antonio Magaña SerranoHospital de Cardiología, Centro Medico Nacional, Siglo XXI, IMSS, Mexico City, Mexico.
Gustavo Rojas VelascoInstituto Nacional de Cardiologia "Ignacio Chavez", Mexico City, Mexico.
Javier AntezanaHospital de Cardiología, Centro Medico Nacional, Siglo XXI, IMSS, Mexico City, Mexico.
Lecsy MacedoCentro Medico 20 de Noviembre, ISSSTE, Mexico City, Mexico.
Jose Luis Leiva-PonsFacultad de Medicina, Universidad Autonoma de San Luis Potosi, San Luis Potosi, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCardiogenic shock (CS) is a complex syndrome characterised by primary cardiac dysfunction. Despite advances in therapeutic options such as mechanical cardiac support, it remains associated with high mortality. Although previous registries have described heterogeneous populations and outcomes across different centres, contemporary real-world data on management practices remain limited. This gap is particularly evident in low- and middle-income countries, where there is no robust registry that clearly defines the current state of CS management. Therefore, a multicentre registry is needed to better characterise current practices and outcomes. Our study aims to gain insight into current therapeutic trends in Mexico, a low- to middle-income country with a significant cardiovascular disease burden. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Mexican Registry of Cardiogenic Shock is a quality initiative that aims to identify therapeutic trends, demographic characteristics and clinical presentations. It also aims to evaluate outcomes, including mortality and cognitive function at in-hospital and 1-year follow-ups, and to identify areas for improvement in the care process across the broad spectrum of CS. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for this multicentre study was obtained from the local research ethics committees of all participating institutions. The study results will be disseminated to all participating institutions in the form of summary reports and presentations on completion of the analysis.

Indexed as

RegistriesShock, CardiogenicFemaleHospital MortalityHumansMaleMexicoMulticenter Studies as TopicResearch DesignAdult intensive & critical careCoronary heart diseaseCoronary interventionHeart failureMyocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID41545049
PMCPMC12815157

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.