ReviewObesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity2026
Interventions for Preventing Obesity in Children and Adolescents Aged 5-18 Years: An Overview of Nonrandomized Study Evidence Reported in 28 Systematic Reviews.
Review in Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionCommunity- and population-level and policy interventions are commonly evaluated using nonrandomized studies (NRS), rather than randomized trials (RCTs). Recent Cochrane reviews of interventions for preventing childhood obesity have been restricted to RCTs, so less is known about the effectiveness of these more upstream interventions. To address this gap, we conducted an overview of reviews of NRS interventions (NRSI), which assessed change in BMI in children and adolescents aged 5-18 years and compared NRSI findings with those from RCTs.
methodsWe searched five databases up to November 2024. Screening, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed using standardized tools.
resultsWe included 28 systematic reviews and identified 136 NRSI either based in school (n = 118), community (n = 4) or combined settings (n = 14) and evaluating policy (n = 48), education (n = 11), or a combined intervention (n = 77). Twenty-six reviews included both NRSIs and RCTs; of these, 12 reported meta-analyses. Findings were largely unchanged when we excluded the RCTs and re-ran analyses. Overall, study-level results from the NRSI favored the intervention group; a quarter favored the comparison group. The meta-analysis summary effects from NRSIs were consistent with two recently published Cochrane meta-analyses of RCTs of obesity prevention interventions.
conclusionsThe results from this overview of reviews suggest researchers and policy makers can be confident in considering the results of robust nonrandomized study designs (evaluating their impact on BMI) alongside RCTs in their decision making. Although we identified a significant number of NRSIs for review, very few evaluations of upstream interventions were eligible for inclusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.