SynthesisBMJ open diabetes research & care2026
Association of genetic variation with age at diagnosis in type 1 diabetes.
Synthesis in BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Childhood type 1 diabetes mellitus and gut microbiota: from microbiome characteristics to prevention and treatment strategies.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionType 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease with a strong genetic basis. The aim of this study was to identify additional single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for type 1 diabetes age at diagnosis and to replicate previously identified loci. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsMeta genome-wide association studies of age at diagnosis from eight cohorts (n=5910 in total) were performed in three models. Model 1 was age at diagnosis with no covariates. Model 2 was age at diagnosis adjusted for DR3/DR4 genotype categories. Model 3 was similar to model 2, including the most significant SNP from model 2 (coded additively). Models 1 and 2 were also performed for major histocompatibility complex (MHC) imputed data. In addition, we tested previously identified loci for age at diagnosis and type 1 diabetes risk for association with age at diagnosis in model 1.
resultsIn model 1, we identified a genome-wide significant locus (rs2856721, p=3.3×10
conclusionsWe identified rs76730244 in the MHC region for age at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes, which was independent of the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.