Observational studyBMJ open ophthalmology2026
NLP-ROPCare: predicting retinopathy of prematurity with admission notes using natural language processing.
Observational study in BMJ open ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prediction of retinopathy of prematurity using machine learning models.Pediatric research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesRetinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a leading cause of blindness in children worldwide, requiring more efficient models to help predict treatment-requiring ROP. Our study aimed to develop a new prediction model for ROP occurrence and severity, named NLP-ROPCare, using natural language processing (NLP). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A retrospective observational study. Infants with a gestational age ≤32 weeks or birth weight ≤2000 g were collected in Guangdong Women and Children Hospital from 2013 to 2022, including 3922 preterm infants with 1106 patients with ROP. Four pretrained language models - BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers), RoBERTa (Robustly Optimized BERT pretraining Approach), MC-BERT (language pre-training via a Meta Controller) and NEZHA (NEural contextualiZed representation for CHinese lAnguage understanding) - were used for development of NLP prediction models based on free-form texts in the admission notes. For comparison, two machine learning methods (Random Forest and Support Vector Machine) were used to construct prediction models based on 20 structured characteristics previously extracted from the admission notes. Performance evaluating metrics included accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score and area under the curve (AUC).
resultsThe NLP prediction models for ROP occurrence outperformed those for severity. The NEZHA model demonstrated the highest accuracy in predicting ROP occurrence, achieving an F1 score of 89.35% and an AUC of 0.90. Its performance was also better than two machine learning models whose highest F1 was 78% with an AUC equal to 0.87. In addition, the F1 score of RoBERTa (78.44%) was slightly higher than that of NEZHA (77.81%) for predicting ROP severity, and the AUC of RoBERTa also achieved the highest 0.91.
conclusionThe NLP-ROPCare combines language models NEZHA and RoBERTa to enable early prediction of ROP occurrence and severity based on unstructured free-form texts in the admission notes of preterm infants, highlighting its value in early prevention of ROP. Further external validation should be carried out to better adjust the model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.