ReviewInternational journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being2026
Experiences, influencing factors, and perceived outcomes from physical literacy interventions: a qualitative meta-synthesis.
Review in International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study synthesised qualitative findings from physical literacy (PL) interventions, focusing on participants' experiences and perceived outcomes. It also explored the key factors influencing these experiences and outcomes to inform future PL interventions.
methodsA secondary data analysis was conducted using a meta-aggregative approach to review qualitative studies from a previously published systematic review (PROSPERO; registration number: CRD42020188926). Studies were included if they: (i) reported results from a PL intervention, (ii) reported participant perceptions, and (iii) were published in English. Studies that reported only quantitative outcomes were excluded, and mixed-methods studies were eligible only if they contained extractable qualitative findings. The data were extracted, synthesised, and categorised using the Joanna Briggs Institute System for the Unified Management, Assessment, and Review of Information.
resultsFollowing the ConQual approach, the overall quality, dependability, and credibility of the 12 included studies were scored as high. A total of 336 findings were aggregated into 95 sub-themes (i.e., categories), which were then categorised into 19 themes. As a result, three overarching themes (i.e., synthesised findings) were identified: program outcomes, factors influencing outcomes, and challenges with implementation.
conclusionsOur synthesis highlights the holistic, context-sensitive nature of successful PL interventions, filling a notable gap in the predominantly quantitative PL literature. Tailoring programs to participant needs, proactively addressing logistical barriers, and continuing to foreground participant perspectives remain crucial for enhancing effectiveness and refining future intervention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.