Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41545324›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being2026

Experiences, influencing factors, and perceived outcomes from physical literacy interventions: a qualitative meta-synthesis.

Jaime Barratt, Hannah Goss, Noah Erskine, Maeghan James, Clemens Töpfer, Klaus Pfeifer, John Cairney, Johannes Carl

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jaime BarrattDepartment of Educational Studies, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6945-6108
Hannah GossSchool of Health and Human Performance, Dublin City University, Whitehall, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-4264-6673
Noah ErskineHealth and Well-Being Centre for Research Innovation, The University of Queensland St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0009-0004-1994-1393
Maeghan JamesSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7384-0738
Clemens TöpferInstitut of Sports Science, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2577-4016
Klaus PfeiferDepartment of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2418-373X
John CairneyHealth and Well-Being Centre for Research Innovation, The University of Queensland St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2856-3967
Johannes CarlDeakin University, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Health and Social Development, Geelong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7393-0450

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study synthesised qualitative findings from physical literacy (PL) interventions, focusing on participants' experiences and perceived outcomes. It also explored the key factors influencing these experiences and outcomes to inform future PL interventions.

methodsA secondary data analysis was conducted using a meta-aggregative approach to review qualitative studies from a previously published systematic review (PROSPERO; registration number: CRD42020188926). Studies were included if they: (i) reported results from a PL intervention, (ii) reported participant perceptions, and (iii) were published in English. Studies that reported only quantitative outcomes were excluded, and mixed-methods studies were eligible only if they contained extractable qualitative findings. The data were extracted, synthesised, and categorised using the Joanna Briggs Institute System for the Unified Management, Assessment, and Review of Information.

resultsFollowing the ConQual approach, the overall quality, dependability, and credibility of the 12 included studies were scored as high. A total of 336 findings were aggregated into 95 sub-themes (i.e., categories), which were then categorised into 19 themes. As a result, three overarching themes (i.e., synthesised findings) were identified: program outcomes, factors influencing outcomes, and challenges with implementation.

conclusionsOur synthesis highlights the holistic, context-sensitive nature of successful PL interventions, filling a notable gap in the predominantly quantitative PL literature. Tailoring programs to participant needs, proactively addressing logistical barriers, and continuing to foreground participant perspectives remain crucial for enhancing effectiveness and refining future intervention strategies.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyHumansQualitative ResearchSystematic Reviews as Topicholistic developmentparticipant experiencesPhysical literacyphysical literacy interventionsprogram outcomes

Identifiers

PMID41545324
PMCPMC12818313

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.