ArticleScientific reports2026
Automated detection of giant cell arteritis from temporal artery biopsy specimens using deep learning approaches.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This pilot study aims to develop a deep learning model for classifying temporal artery biopsy (TAB) histological sections to detect histologic patterns indicative of giant cell arteritis (GCA). Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded, hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) -stained, tissue specimens from 472 patients who underwent TAB between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2019, were digitized at 20x magnification. Individual artery regions were identified, extracted, and resized into individual image patches/tiles, referred to as regions of interest (ROIs), for GCA detection. A ResNet model was trained using these ROIs after data augmentation techniques. Performance metrics such as accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the model. The training set included 336 slides (100 positive, 236 negative), and the test set comprised 136 slides (40 positive, 96 negative). The ResNet model achieved an accuracy of 96.32% with an AUC of 0.99 on the validation set, and 92.32% accuracy with an AUC of 0.93 on a held-out test set. Model predictions were validated using GradCAM visualizations which qualitatively confirmed the model’s performance. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of deep neural network methods in automating the detection of GCA from TAB, and this approach holds promise for speeding up diagnosis and improving test sensitivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.