ArticleScientific reports2026
Classifying retinal images via vascular-optic disc cross-segmentation and attentive feature selection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Automated Classification of Second- and Third-Degree Burn Images Using Convolutional Neural Networks.European burn journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prevalence of retinal disorders is rising at an alarming rate, posing a significant risk of irreversible blindness without timely intervention. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have enabled the development of automated screening systems for retinal image analysis. However, building robust models presents challenges due to inconsistencies in image acquisition, varying resolutions, and imbalanced class distributions. To address these issues, this research introduces a novel abnormality-aware attentive feature selection approach for classifying retinal images into three categories: healthy (H), glaucoma (G), and diabetic retinopathy (DR). This method focuses on extracting the most discriminative features to enhance classification performance. Additionally, we propose a cross-segmentation framework that extracts and integrates comprehensive multiview information-specifically, optic disc and vascular structures-from the input retinal images. By leveraging these supplementary features, our approach effectively addresses low inter-class variability and enriches the information available for accurate classification. Extensive experiments conducted on diverse publicly available datasets-including FIVES, Drishti-GS1, SUSTech, HRF, and PAPILA-demonstrate the robustness of the proposed method. The model achieved a balanced accuracy of 83% (95% CI: 80%-86%), with sensitivities of 0.81 for the healthy class, 0.81 for glaucoma, and 0.87 for diabetic retinopathy. The corresponding specificity values were 0.84, 0.83, and 0.85; positive predictive values (PPV) were 0.83, 0.75, and 0.90; and negative predictive values (NPV) were 0.86, 0.91, and 0.96, respectively. These results indicate that the model is robust in distinguishing between the three classes, exhibiting balanced performance across all metrics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.