ArticleScientific reports2026
Prediction of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in left bundle branch block using a fine-tuned ECG foundation model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiography for assessment of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in the era of foundation models.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Left bundle branch block (LBBB) is an important electrocardiographic (ECG) finding strongly associated with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD), a condition linked to poor clinical outcomes. Although early LVSD detection is crucial, standard diagnosis via echocardiography may not always be immediately accessible. In this study, we propose a fine-tuned ECG foundation model (FM) to enhance LVSD detection specifically in patients with LBBB. We conducted a retrospective multicenter analysis of 2,031 paired ECG-echocardiographic datasets from 892 LBBB patients. The ECG-FM was fine-tuned for optimal LVSD prediction and compared against baseline models, which were conventional deep learning methods, including Fully Convolutional Network (FCN), LSTM-FCN, ResNet, and InceptionTime. The proposed ECG-FM with single-step full fine-tuning outperformed baseline models, achieving accuracy, sensitivity, and AUROC of 0.758, 0.771, and 0.807, respectively. Additionally, sequential partial fine-tuning exhibited the highest sensitivity (0.787), enhancing screening capability. DeepLIFT analysis identified QRS complex and T wave features in leads V1–V4 as critical predictive factors. Our results demonstrated that the recommended fine-tuned ECG-FM significantly improves LBBB patient LVSD detection, potentially enabling earlier clinical diagnosis in such cases when echocardiography is not readily available, thereby potentially improving patient outcomes and clinical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.