Trial reportNature medicine2026
Nous-209 neoantigen vaccine for cancer prevention in Lynch syndrome carriers: a phase 1b/2 trial.
Trial report in Nature medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07510308 (A Clinical Trial Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, and Preliminary Antitumor Activity of MSH2-/- Tumor Cell Vaccines in Patients With Advanced pMMR Colorectal Cancer.), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Clinical Trial Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, and Preliminary Antitumor Activity of MSH2-/- Tumor Cell Vaccines in Patients With Advanced pMMR Colorectal Cancer.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Randomised phase III trials of cancer prevention drugs: a systematic review and prediction of trial success.ESMO open · 2026Review
- Recent developments in cancer immuno-interception strategies.Trends in molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Systemic immune activation in hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes: a cross-sectional study.BMC medicine · 2026Article
- Recent advances in etiology and treatment of von Hippel-Lindau Disease (VHLD).Cancer metastasis reviews · 2026Review
- First-in-human testing of a mutant KRAS vaccine for pancreatic cancer interception in high-risk cohorts.Cancer discovery · 2026Article
- Sequence-Anchored Shared Tumor-Specific Epitopes for Pre-Manufactured HLA-Matched mRNA Cancer Vaccine Libraries: A Pan-Cancer Framework.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- Vaccine strategies for cancer prevention in Lynch syndrome: the potential of dendritic cell-based therapy.Familial cancer · 2026Review
- Accelerating discovery of cancer causes for prevention in the era of rising early-onset cancers.Cell · 2026Review
- Preventive vaccines for hereditary cancer syndromes.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- Hereditary cancer syndromes with gynecological cancer risk: focus on prevention strategies.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Immune microenvironment evolution across the serrated neoplasia pathway and its relevance to immunotherapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Immune interception in cancer: prioritizing vaccination in high-risk and premalignant settings.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer interception is a preventative approach aiming to reduce cancer incidence by targeting precancers and early-stage cancers. Lynch syndrome (LS) is a prevalent hereditary cancer syndrome affecting ~1 in 300 individuals, with an overall lifetime cancer risk as high as 80%. LS is caused by germline mutations in the DNA mismatch repair genes, leading to microsatellite instability (MSI) and accumulation of shared mutations. When these occur in coding regions, they generate frameshift peptides (FSPs). Nous-209 is a neoantigen-directed immunotherapy based on a heterologous prime boost using great ape adenovirus and modified vaccinia virus Ankara encoding 209 FSPs shared across MSI neoplasms. We present the results from cohort 1 of a phase 1b/2 single-arm trial of Nous-209 for cancer interception in LS carriers (n = 45). Safety and immunogenicity were coprimary endpoints. Safety was assessed in 45 participants. Vaccination was safe with no intervention-related serious adverse events (AEs). The most common AEs were injection-site reactions (any grade in 91% of participants after prime and 76% after boost with no grade 3) and fatigue (any grade in 80% after prime and 53% after boost with 4% grade 3 after prime or after boost). Neoantigen-specific immune responses were observed after vaccination in 100% of evaluable participants (n = 37), with induction of potent T cell immunity (mean response at peak of ~1,100 interferon-γ spot-forming cells per million peripheral blood mononuclear cells). The immune response was durable and detectable at 1 year in 85% of participants. Both CD8
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.