Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41545677›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A hybrid learning framework integrating chaotic Niche alpha evolution for student academic performance prediction.

Hang Chen, Yi Zhou, Qike Cao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hang ChenXi'an Eurasia University, Xi'an, 710065, Shaanxi, China.
Yi ZhouSichuan College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Mianyang, 621000, Sichuan, China. okzhouyi2013@163.com.
Qike CaoHenan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang, 453003, Henan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate prediction of student academic performance plays a vital role in enabling early intervention, adaptive instruction, and data-driven educational decision-making. However, the effectiveness of deep learning models such as Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks is often constrained by suboptimal hyper-parameter tuning and insufficient exploration of the search space. To overcome these limitations, this paper introduces a novel hybrid learning framework, CNAE-LSTM, which integrates Chaotic initialization, a Niche-based evolutionary mechanism, and Alpha Evolution (AE) into a unified optimization paradigm termed Chaotic Niche Alpha Evolution (CNAE). Specifically, a chaotic operator is first employed to enhance population diversity during initialization; then a niche-based grouping strategy partitions the population into three subgroups with distinct mutation probabilities to preserve diversity and avoid premature convergence; finally, an Alpha Evolution mechanism guides the evolutionary search toward promising regions with improved exploration–exploitation balance. The proposed CNAE is utilized to optimize key LSTM hyper-parameters, including network architecture and training settings. Extensive experiments conducted on a real-world secondary education dataset demonstrate that CNAE-LSTM consistently outperforms conventional LSTM, SVM, CNN, Transformer models, as well as LSTM enhanced by QGA, QPSO, CWOA, QGWO, and grid/random search strategies. Results show that CNAE-LSTM achieves superior predictive accuracy, stability, and generalization capability, validating the effectiveness of the proposed hybrid framework for improving academic performance prediction.

Indexed as

Academic Performance PredictionAlpha Evolution AlgorithmChaotic OperatorLSTMNiche Operator

Identifiers

PMID41545677
PMCPMC12881578

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.