SynthesisBMC palliative care2026
Palliative care needs in adults with chronic disease: a systematic review of measuring instruments.
Synthesis in BMC palliative care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe need for palliative care continues to grow, however, early identification of patients with these needs remains challenging. Despite the emergence of new instruments, assessment tools applicable to chronic diseases remain scarce, targeting specific risks and populations. This study aims to review the current evidence on the properties of instruments used to identify and measure palliative care needs in adults with chronic diseases.
methodsA systematic review was developed following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology, adhering to the PRISMA-COSMIN guidelines for Outcome Measurement Instruments (OMIs), and registered on Prospero (CRD42024519532). Searches were conducted in Medline, CINAHL Complete, Cochrane, grey literature, and manual sources, between March and April 2024, applying the following eligibility criteria: studies that encompass palliative care measurement instruments in adult patients with chronic conditions, within acute or community care settings, with no restrictions on language or publication period. Two authors independently screened the studies, using Rayyan for data selection and the COSMIN tool to assess instrument quality.
resultsOf the 4769 studies screened, 11 met the inclusion criteria. The majority of the 11 instruments can be applied across various contexts, targeting different populations, including those with organ failure, dementia, and frailty. The tools were based on a wide range of both general and specific indicators, primarily dichotomous. The IPOS achieved the highest score in psychometric quality.
conclusionsThis review supports healthcare professionals in their efforts to identify and measure palliative care needs in adults with chronic diseases. Further research should focus on the applicability of these instruments across various healthcare settings and populations to enhance their psychometric quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.