SynthesisBMC geriatrics2026
Association between sociodemographic factors and mobility among older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Risk and protective factors associated with depressive symptoms in older adults with visual impairment: a systematic review.The Gerontologist · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMobility limitation is associated with poor quality of life, morbidity, and mortality among older adults. This pre-registered systematic review [PROSPERO CRD42022298570] synthesised the coefficients of association between sociodemographic factors and performance-based mobility outcomes in older adults (≥ 60 years).
methodsElectronic databases MEDLINE, WoS, EMBASE, CINAHL, AgeLine, and SPORTDiscus were searched from inception to 27 November 2023 for observational studies reporting an association between sociodemographic factors and performance-based mobility outcomes among older adults. Pairs of reviewers independently conducted title, abstract, and full-text screening, narrative synthesis, and meta-analysis following the PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. The effect sizes, heterogeneity, dominance, and publication bias were analysed using R/R-Studio (version 4.3.2) and CMA (version 4).
resultsOf the 9,328 studies screened, 57 were included (n = 130,060 participants); the pooled mean age was 69.81 ± 7.21years, habitual gait speed (HGS) = 1.01 ± 0.28 m/s, and time-up and go score = 7.67 ± 3.56s. The narrative synthesis showed that the majority of the studies found older age (92.2%), women (62.9%), non-Caucasian (75.0%), and lower education (64.5%) associated with significant mobility outcomes. There was a paucity of studies on marital status, area of residence, income, occupation, religion, homeownership, and social status. Meta-analysis showed that older age r=-0.37 [-0.42, -0.32] and female gender r=-0.13 [-0.22, -0.03] were moderately associated with slower HGS.
conclusionOlder age, female gender, non-Caucasian identity, and lower education were consistently associated with poorer mobility outcomes, pointing to sociodemographic sources of inequity and the need for targeted interventions. Limited evidence on marital status, residence, income, occupation, religion, homeownership, and social status restricted broader conclusions. Expanding research across these domains is critical to inform comprehensive strategies that advance equitable mobility and healthier ageing in diverse populations.
trial registrationSystematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42022298570.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.