Observational studyBMC ophthalmology2026
A refractive error prediction model for children and adolescents based on ocular biometric parameters.
Observational study in BMC ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo develop a predictive model based on ocular biometric parameters and deep learning for studying the progression of refractive errors in children and adolescents.
methodsThis longitudinal observational cohort study included 559 children and adolescents (1,118eyes; 252males, 307females) aged 5–18 years, enrolled at Shanxi provincial Eye Hospital (Taiyuan, China) between 2019 and 2023. Refractive error and ocular biometric parameters were prospectively assessed through serial non-cycloplegic automated refraction and LENSAR 900 biometry, with participants undergoing 2–5 follow-up evaluations at irregular intervals. After data cleaning, preprocessing, and augmentation through truncation techniques, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Time-aware LSTM (T-LSTM) models were used to predict refractive changes over the next three years. Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Standard Deviation (SD) were used to evaluate model performance, reported as MAE ± SD.
resultsBaseline MAEs measured 0.40 ± 0.39D (sphere) and 0.30 ± 0.46D (cylinder), exhibiting temporal deterioration over 12 quarters (sphere: 0.35 ± 0.42D→0.52 ± 0.37D; cylinder: 0.20 ± 0.21D→0.33 ± 0.30D).Additional biometric measurements reduced errors across cohorts: with five measurements ≤ 6y achieved 0.11 ± 0.10D (sphere)/0.09 ± 0.10D (cylinder); 10-12y />12y attained 0.18 ± 0.13D/0.10 ± 0.08D. The steepest error reduction occurred in older cohorts (10-12y/>12y), suggesting that fewer measurements achieve lower prediction errors with increasing age.
conclusionThe deep learning model developed in this study, based on ocular biometric parameters, demonstrated high accuracy and stability in refractive error prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.