ReviewExperimental dermatology2026
Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibition in Melanoma.
Review in Experimental dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Arylsulfatase B and Pembrolizumab in combination on progression of metastatic melanoma in the B16F10 syngeneic mouse model.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibition in Melanoma.Experimental dermatology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are involved in the degradation of the extracellular matrix (ECM) and are found to participate in all stages of tumour progression including modifying signalling pathways, regulating cytokines and promoting tumour growth, particularly by inducing angiogenesis and facilitating cancer spread. Extensive research has been concentrated on identifying and developing MMP inhibitors for cancer treatment, including melanoma, with particular focus on MMP-2, MMP-9 and MMP-14. MMP-2 and MMP-9 are gelatinases involved in collagen degradation, tumour invasion and angiogenesis, while MMP-14 activates other MMPs and promotes tumour cell migration. Early broad-spectrum MMP inhibitors showed limited success and significant side effects. However, selective MMP inhibitors offer a more targeted approach that may address these problems. By focusing on specific MMPs essential for melanoma invasion, metastasis and angiogenesis, these inhibitors have the potential to improve treatment efficacy and reduce the off-target effects seen with earlier broad-spectrum therapies. Recent years have seen a marked increase in studies on natural MMP inhibitors for melanoma, driven by their biocompatibility and reduced side effects. In addition to inhibiting MMPs, many of these inhibitors also provide antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and immune-modulatory benefits, thus enhancing their therapeutic potential and overall effectiveness in cancer treatment. These findings highlight the promising role of MMP inhibitors in melanoma therapy, suggesting a shift towards more targeted and combinatory treatment strategies. This review aims to provide an up-to-date overview of the advancements and therapeutic prospects of both synthetic and natural MMP inhibitors in melanoma treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.