ReviewSleep medicine2026
Sleep apnoea and its consequences: from animal models to precision medicine.
Review in Sleep medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A European Respiratory Society research seminar entitled "Sleep Apnoea and Its Consequences: From Animal Models to Precision Medicine" was held in January 2024 in Lisbon, Portugal. It provided an in-depth analysis of the current landscape and future directions in OSA research, integrating recent findings from metabolomics, animal models, clinical predictors of cardiometabolic consequences of OSA, artificial intelligence (AI), and advances in diagnostic algorithms. This article presents a narrative review of the seminar's key discussions and conclusions. The limitations of current randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in assessing OSA treatment, such as low adherence and patient selection bias (e.g., absence of sleepiness or severe hypoxemia), were critically discussed. The expert panel recommended the use of real-world data, including patients commonly seen in clinical practice, and the use of digital tools for real-time monitoring of adherence and side effects. The concept of platform "disease-focused" trials was discussed as a more efficient and adaptable research design that could allow clinical trials to be more representative of the general OSA population and to compare CPAP with emerging treatments such as new drugs, devices and lifestyle interventions to gain a broader understanding of effective management strategies. The seminar concluded that a multifaceted approach to OSA research that leverages the strengths of animal models, advanced AI, metabolomics, and improved diagnostic algorithms is needed to gain deeper insights into the mechanisms of OSA and its treatment response. This new approach, coupled with new "platform" clinical trial designs, could contribute to improved outcomes in patients with OSA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.