Evidence mapPaperPMID 41547765Full record

ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2026

Metabolic score for visceral fat profiles and incident cardiovascular disease in adults with CKM syndrome stages 0-3: a CHARLS longitudinal study.

Hao Zhang, Shun Li, Junpeng Kan, Tingting Xia, Ning Cao, Hui Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hao ZhangDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95 Yong'an Road, Beijing, 100050, China.
Shun LiNational Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Junpeng KanDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95 Yong'an Road, Beijing, 100050, China.
Tingting XiaDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95 Yong'an Road, Beijing, 100050, China.
Ning CaoDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95 Yong'an Road, Beijing, 100050, China. caoning@bjmu.edu.cn.
Hui ChenDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95 Yong'an Road, Beijing, 100050, China. 13910710028@163.com.

Funding

Beijing Natural Science Foundation L2322116National Natural Science Foundation of China 82200284Training Fund for Open Projects at the Clinical Institutes and Departments of Capital Medical University CCMU2024ZKYXZ003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Metabolic Score for Visceral Fat (METS-VF) is a novel index reflecting visceral adiposity and metabolic dysfunction, but its association with incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) in adults with Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic (CKM) syndrome stages 0-3 remains unclear. This study aimed to explore this association and quantify the mediating effect of estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR).

methodsUtilizing data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), we prospectively followed 3,815 adults with CKM syndrome stages 0-3 (baseline 2015) until 2020. The METS-VF profiles comprised baseline METS-VF, cumulative METS-VF, and change patterns identified by latent class growth modeling (LCGM). To investigate associations and underlying mechanisms, Cox proportional-hazards regression, weighted quantile sum (WQS) regression, and mediation analysis were employed. Sensitivity analyses (stratification by CKM syndrome stage and demographics, inverse probability weighting [IPW], Fine-Gray model) were used to support the robustness of the results.

resultsOver a mean 4.4-year follow-up, 18.7% of participants developed CVD. In the fully adjusted model, elevated METS-VF profiles were associated with an increased risk of CVD: baseline METS-VF in the fourth quartile (HR = 1.615, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.243-2.097), cumulative METS-VF in the fourth quartile (HR = 1.824, 95% CI: 1.397-2.381), and stable high-level METS-VF (Class 3) (HR = 1.288, 95% CI: 1.033-1.610). All associations remained significant following false discovery rate (FDR) correction. Stratified analyses showed stronger associations between METS-VF profiles and incident CVD in late-stage (vs. early-stage) CKM syndrome, with the association more pronounced in males-females only had significant associations in the highest quartile. WQS regression identified Metabolic Score for Insulin Resistance (METS-IR) as the primary contributing factor, with weights of 0.397 in 2011 and 0.375 in 2015. Mediation analysis indicated that eGDR mediated 65.38% of the baseline and 56.72% of the cumulative effects (both P < 0.001). Supplementary mediation analysis using body mass index (BMI)-based METS-VF

conclusionsMETS-VF profiles are independently associated with incident CVD in CKM syndrome stages 0-3, more strongly in late stages. eGDR significantly mediates this relationship, supporting the "obesity-metabolism-vascular" axis. METS-VF may aid CVD risk stratification in CKM syndrome populations, and targeting insulin sensitivity may mitigate CVD risk.

Indexed as

AdiposityCardiovascular DiseasesIntra-Abdominal FatKidney DiseasesMetabolic SyndromeAgedBlood GlucoseChinaFemaleHumansIncidenceInsulin ResistanceLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisBlood GlucoseCardiovascular disease (CVD)Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic (CKM) syndromeEstimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR)Mediation effectMetabolic score for visceral fat (METS-VF)

Identifiers

PMID41547765
PMCPMC12895603

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.