ArticleClinical proteomics2026
Tetraspanin-based immunocapture for high-depth proteomic profiling of extracellular vesicles from cerebrospinal fluid for biomarker discovery.
Article in Clinical proteomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDue to its proximity to cells of the central nervous system, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is an important source of novel biomarkers for neurological diseases. Membrane-bound extracellular vesicles (EVs) are enriched for proteins of intracellular and membrane origin, implicated in the pathogenesis of some neurological diseases, and secreted into CSF. Proteomic profiling of CSF-EVs, however, is limited by the large volumes required for typical EV isolation protocols.
methodsWe appraised the performance of tetraspanin (CD81, CD63, CD9)-based immunocapture for EV isolation from 200 to 1000 µL CSF sample and compared to size-exclusion chromatography (SEC). EVs were profiled by library-free data independent-acquisition (DIA) mass spectrometry to assess protein depth and abundance of specific EV markers and known co-isolates. Abundance and precursor peptide locations for potential neuronal-specific immunocapture targets described in the literature were also assessed.
resultsImmunocapture was effective using CSF volumes as low as 200 µL, consistently detecting core EV markers and reducing relative levels of non-vesicular proteins such as Apolipoprotein B (APOB) and galectin 3 binding protein (LGALS3BP) compared with size-exclusion chromatography (SEC). Proteomic depth reached 811 ± 14 protein groups in EVs from 200 µL CSF, increasing to 1285 ± 224 when using feature alignment across runs with up to 1000 µL starting volume. These included eleven candidate biomarkers of neurological diseases that were detected in all preparation methods, with additional candidates detected by immunocapture only. Increased depth was observed for both transmembrane and secreted proteins using immunocapture compared with SEC, with proportional enrichment of transmembrane proteins.
conclusionsThis work demonstrates the effectiveness of tetraspanin immunocapture for proteomic profiling of EVs in small volumes of CSF that can be adapted to use with cell-type-specific markers of choice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.