ArticleBMC nursing2026
Mapping the evidence on support for family caregivers in total knee arthroplasty recovery: a scoping review.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFamily caregivers play a critical role in the recovery and rehabilitation of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Despite this importance, research on family caregiver support is fragmented and lacks a structured framework that accounts for the evolving nature of family caregiver responsibilities over time.
aimTo map the current evidence on support for family caregivers of patients undergoing TKA, using a modified “Timing It Right” theory framework to categorize family caregivers’ needs across different stages of the surgical trajectory.
methodsThis scoping review was conducted in accordance with JBI scoping review methodology. Peer-reviewed studies published between 2010 and 2025 were retrieved from PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase. Studies were included if they addressed family caregiver support in the context of TKA and reported relevant outcomes. Findings were synthesized and categorized into four phases: Event/Diagnosis and Stabilization, Preparation, Implementation, and Adaptation.
resultsNineteen studies involving 1,822 caregivers and 1,878 patients were included. Most studies emphasized appraisal (84%) and informational support (58%), while emotional and training support were underrepresented. Support delivery varied across hospital, outpatient, and home settings. Only four studies implemented structured caregiver interventions. Caregiver needs were infrequently assessed or used to tailor support. The Adaptation phase was least addressed. Few studies evaluated intervention effectiveness longitudinally or included diverse populations.
conclusionCurrent evidence highlights critical gaps in caregiver support, especially in personalization, emotional care, and long-term follow-up. Future research should focus on developing theory-based, phase-specific, and culturally sensitive interventions to strengthen caregiver involvement in TKA rehabilitation. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.