ArticleJournal of animal science2026
Zinc regulation of lipidome remodeling during boar sperm capacitation.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sperm capacitation is essential for fertilization and is characterized by a cascade of biochemical signaling and membrane remodeling events. This process is highly dependent on membrane composition. Profiling lipid alterations provides a critical window into the molecular underpinnings of capacitation and the regulatory influence of zinc ions (Zn2+). Metabolomic studies in boar sperm have shown that capacitation coincides with broad shifts in metabolite abundance and that extracellular zinc attenuates or redirects many of these changes, highlighting its role as a key modulator. To extend this framework to the lipidome, we profiled boar sperm under three conditions: non-capacitated (0 h), capacitated in vitro (4 h), and capacitated with extracellular zinc (4 h + Zn), using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and image-based flow cytometry to validate capacitation status. Relative to 0 h, capacitation was associated with altered abundances of 30 lipids (P < 0.05) spanning several lipid categories: fatty acyls (n = 8), sterol lipids (n = 7), sphingolipids (n = 1), glycerolipids (n = 3), glycerophospholipids (n = 4), and unannotated lipids (n = 9). When exogenous Zn2+ was supplemented during in vitro capacitation, 12 of these shifts were maintained at 0 h-like levels (P < 0.05), suggesting an inhibiting or stabilizing role. In 2 of 16 hits, exogenously supplemented Zn2+ enhanced the capacitation-associated change (P < 0.05), whereas in the remaining 14 it exerted no measurable effect (P > 0.05). When exogenous Zn2+ was supplemented during in vitro capacitation, distinct lipid shifts were identified and organized using Tukey's lipid-pattern classification based on significance (P < 0.05) and directionality, organizing them into four categories: Type-1 lipids (capacitation-associated), Type-2 lipids (zinc-inhibited), Type-3 lipids (zinc-specific response), and Type-4 lipids (zinc-enhanced). These categories describe distinct modes of lipid regulation, where some species remained unaffected by zinc (Type-1, n = 16), others were stabilized or inhibited from progressing toward capacitation-associated levels (Type-2, n = 12), a subset responded exclusively to zinc independent of capacitation (Type-3, n = 4), and a small group exhibited amplified capacitation-linked shifts under zinc supplementation (Type-4, n = 2). Together, these data reveal a class-specific, zinc-dependent architecture of lipid remodeling that integrates metabolic and membrane regulation within the broader capacitation cascade.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.