ArticleScientific reports2026
Confidence-gradient reweighting and lightweight feature enhancement algorithm for steel surface defect detection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- MCM-YOLO: A Lightweight Conflict Mitigation Network for Industrial Metal Surface Defect Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Steel surface defect detection is susceptible to small target sizes, low contrast, and class imbalance. To this end, we propose the Gradient-Reweighting with Awareness of Confidence and Lightweight Feature Enhancement (GRACE) algorithm built upon YOLO11s, composed of two synergistic modules: Dynamic Sampling with Confidence-Gradient Balanced Sampling Mechanism (DS-CBSM++) performs dynamic reweighting via joint confidence-gradient feedback, improving the separability of hard examples and long-tailed classes; Lightweight Feature Enhancement Network (Lite-FEN) introduces lightweight channel/spatial enhancement at the P3 layer to strengthen shallow textures and boundary cues while keeping computation low. Experiments on the NEU-DET dataset show that the baseline YOLO11s achieves an mAP@0.5:0.95 of 42.66% and an mAP@0.5 of 74.69%. GRACE achieves 43.66% and 75.88%, respectively, improving over the baseline by 1.00 percentage points and 1.19 percentage points, with 9.56 M parameters, suitable for real-time inference. These results indicate that GRACE yields more robust detection and localization of small defects under complex textured backgrounds.Additional experiments on the GC10-DET and X-SDD datasets further confirm that GRACE maintains competitive performance across different steel surface defect distributions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.