ArticleNeurosurgical review2026
Establishment and verification of a clinical prediction model for hematoma expansion in the acute phase of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To establish and validate a nomogram prediction model for hematoma expansion (HE) in the acute phase of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (HICH), based on clinical data, laboratory results, and imaging features, providing a new theoretical basis for the diagnosis and treatment of HICH. A retrospective analysis of 569 HICH patients was performed. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of HE. Thirty-one potential influencing factors were screened using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression to establish a nomogram prediction model. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the model's discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility. Among the 569 HICH patients,132 experienced HE (incidence rate:23.2%). LASSO regression identified six predictors (the time from onset to initial CT (FirstCT), delayed intraventricular hemorrhage, blend sign, black hole sign, GCS score, and INR) to construct the nomogram. The area under the ROC curve was 0.784. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed P = 0.994, indicating good agreement between the predicted and actual outcomes. DCA demonstrated clinical applicability within a certain probability range, providing a theoretical basis for early clinical intervention. The prediction model based on clinical data, laboratory results, and imaging features has good predictive performance and can aid in early identification and individualized treatment of HE in HICH patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.