ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2026
Effects of combined resistance and plyometric training modalities on vertical jump and sprint: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effects of plyometric training on performance-related metrics in track and field athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, with preliminary evidence on injury prevention.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative effects of exercise-based interventions on jump, linear sprint, and change-of-direction performance in female adolescent team-sport athletes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveJump height and sprint speed are essential athletic qualities for explosive power-oriented sports. A growing body of evidence suggests that combined resistance training (RT) and plyometric training (PT) modalities are more effective than isolated RT or PT in enhancing vertical jump and sprint performance. However, the optimal modality remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effects of different combined RT and PT modalities on vertical jump and sprint capacity.
methodsA systematic search was conducted across five databases (Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane) from inception to February 26, 2025, to identify English-language studies including combined RT and PT modalities. Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed using the “GeMTC” package in R v4.0.4.
resultsThirty-four studies involving 1,057 participants were included. Compared to control group (CG), all combined RT and PT modalities and RT improved 20-meter sprint performance except for requiring completing all PT exercises before initiating RT (PT+RT) [mean difference (MD)＝0.01, 95% CI＝(－0.12, 0.04)]. Similarly, all combined RT and PT modalities and RT enhanced CMJ performance except for compound training (CTS) [MD＝3.40, 95% CI＝(－4.80, 12.00)]. Compared with RT, only complex training (CT) demonstrated significant improvements in CMJ height [MD＝2.50, 95% CI＝(0.85, 4.10)] and 20-meter sprint time reduction [MD＝－0.10, 95% CI＝(－0.18,－0.04)].
conclusionCombined RT and PT modalities, along with RT, improve CMJ and 20-meter sprint performance, with CT emerging as the most effective modality among these combined modalities for optimizing these outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.