Evidence mapPaperPMID 41549700Full record

ArticleJournal of telemedicine and telecare2026

Program cost and return on investment analysis of remote patient monitoring for hypertension management in the cardiology department of a large healthcare system.

Donglan S Zhang, Laure Millet, Brandon K Bellows, Sarah Lee, Devin Mann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of telemedicine and telecare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Donglan S ZhangCenter for Population and Health Services Research, Department of Foundations of Medicine, New York University Grossman Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5225-4721
Laure MilletHealthcare Innovations Bridging Research, Informatics and Design, Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Brandon K BellowsDivision of General Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Sarah LeeCenter for Population and Health Services Research, Department of Foundations of Medicine, New York University Grossman Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY, USA.
Devin MannHealthcare Innovations Bridging Research, Informatics and Design, Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

Using agent-based modeling to compare strategies that can reduce rural-urban disparities in cardiovascular diseaseR01MD013886 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI Donglan Zhang · 2022 to 2022
$0k
NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD013886
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ObjectivesRemote patient monitoring (RPM), combining home blood pressure measurements with telehealth services, effectively manages hypertension. Successful implementation of RPM programs at scale requires understanding program costs and financial sustainability. We evaluated the financial performance of an RPM program.MethodsConducted from March to June 2024 in the Cardiology Division at New York University Langone Health, the study used field observation, surveys, and micro-costing methods. A costing tool was developed to quantify program costs in 2024 US dollars, including personnel, equipment, and supplies. RPM-related services reimbursement rates were estimated using Medicare billing information. The return-on-investment (ROI) ratio was calculated by dividing net return (profit) by the RPM program costs. Sensitivity analyses assessed the impact of varying parameters on the ROI of RPM.ResultsThe average RPM program cost was estimated at $330 per patient (range: $208-$452). Major expenses included data review by staff ($172 per patient), blood pressure devices ($48 per patient), and phone communications ($36 per patient). ROI varied based on patient compliance with home blood pressure monitoring (≥16 days per month), with an average estimate of 22.2% (range: -11.1%-93.3%) per patient at a 55% compliance rate. The ROI was most sensitive to changes in data-review costs, insurance reimbursement rates, patient compliance, device setup, and communication costs.ConclusionsThe RPM program achieved a positive ROI from the perspective of a clinical division in a large healthcare system. Successful implementation and financial sustainability of RPM require efforts to reduce human resource costs and enhance patient engagement.

Indexed as

clinical workflowshypertensioninsurance reimbursementpatient complianceprogram costRemote patient monitoringreturn on investment analysistelehealth

Identifiers

PMID41549700
PMCPMC13016703

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.