ArticleJournal of cell science2026
Changes in nuclear and actin mechanics from G1 to G2 affect nuclear integrity.
Article in Journal of cell science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cell cycle-dependent chromatin motion: a role for DNA content doubling over cohesion.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Getting nuclear size just right - emerging mechanisms regulating nuclear scaling and morphology.Journal of cell science · 2026Review
- Nuclear blebs are composed of variable chromatin states but consistently enrich transcription initiation relative to elongation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The structural integrity of the nucleus is dependent on nuclear mechanical elements of chromatin and lamins resisting antagonistic actin cytoskeleton forces. Force imbalance results in nuclear blebbing, rupture and cellular dysfunction found in many human diseases. Here, we used the fluorescent ubiquitin cell cycle indicator (FUCCI) cells to determine how cell cycle changes affect the nucleus and actin force balance. Whereas nuclear blebs were present equally throughout interphase, nuclear blebs formed predominantly in G1 and then persisted into G2. Actin-based nuclear confinement and focal adhesion density was greater in G1 versus G2 cells. Removal of focal adhesions through treatment with an inhibitor resulted in decreased nuclear confinement and blebbing, supporting this as the underlying mechanism. Upon artificial confinement, G2 nuclei ruptured more than G1 nuclei. Single nucleus micromanipulation force measurements confirmed that G1 nuclei were stiffer than G2 nuclei in both the chromatin-based and lamin-based nuclear stiffness regimes. Decreased nuclear stiffness can be explained by loss of peripheral H3K9me3 from G1 to G2, recapitulated by H3K9me3 inhibition through treatment with chaetocin. Cell cycle-based changes in nuclear and actin mechanics impact nuclear integrity and shape.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.