ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention2026
Life's Essential 8 and cardiovascular health: Protective effects on chronic respiratory diseases.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Correspondence: Life' s Essential 8 and cardiovascular health: Protective effects on chronic respiratory diseases.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs) pose a global health challenge. While individual lifestyle factors are known to influence CRDs risk, the collective role of comprehensive cardiovascular health (CVH) metrics remains less clear. Life's Essential 8 (LE8) provides a holistic measure of CVH, but its association with CRDs and related mortality is not well-established at the population level. Methods: The observational study was based on the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES 2007-2018). We adjusted for confounding factors and used survey-weighted logistic regression analysis to assess the association between LE8 and the risk of CRDs and the subtypes. Restricted cubic splines (RCS) evaluated non-linear relationships. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were also conducted. Cox models investigated LE8's impact on all-cause and chronic lower respiratory diseases (CLRDs) mortality. Results: The observational study included 30,863 participants. After adjusting for confounders, survey-weighted logistic regression demonstrates a negative association between LE8 and the risk of CRDs and the four subtypes, with emphysema showing the most significant association (OR = 0.96, 95 % CI: 0.95, 0.97, Conclusion: LE8 inversely correlates with CRDs, and high CVH protects against all-cause and CLRDs mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.