Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41550144›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutical science advances2024

The effect of particle size on drug bioavailability in various parts of the body.

Zi Hong Mok

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutical science advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Zi Hong MokSwansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple mechanisms are involved in driving the efficacy of drug delivery. Drug particle size is one of the challenges as particles need to be delivered from the external environment, into the circulation or interstitial fluid and transiting the cell membranes for cellular internalisation. Small particles are presumably easier to be internalised, yet they are not easy to retain as they are subject to fast clearance. Big particles do not cross biological barriers as easily, but their size distribution is easier to be controlled. Because of the various routes of administration, the size range of these particles will also need to be catered for the anatomical, biological, and dynamic barriers involved. This review hopes to provide an insight into the range of particle size that has been engineered for drug delivery via various routes of administration of the body, such as to cross the epithelium of gastrointestinal tract, lungs, skin, blood-brain barrier, kidney and liver, the eye, nose, and ear, the cancer tumour matrix and into the muscles. While successful drug delivery also depends on the material properties of the delivery systems and the bio/nano interface related properties, this review focuses on the importance of particle size for enhancing bioavailability at the various organs of the body.

Indexed as

AbsorptionInternalisationMicroparticlesNanoparticlesParticle size

Identifiers

PMID41550144
PMCPMC12709987

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.