ReviewJPRAS open2026
Neurolymphatic clearance in neurodegenerative disease: Emerging mechanisms and potential translational strategies.
Review in JPRAS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robotic-assisted lymphatic surgery for lymphedema: Bibliometric mapping of an emerging reconstructive field.JPRAS open · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence and Robotic Surgery in Lymphedema: A Scoping Review of Current Applications, Clinical Translation, and Evidence Gaps.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Response to correspondence on: "Neurolymphatic clearance in neurodegenerative disease: Emerging mechanisms and potential translational strategies".JPRAS open · 2026Article
- Correspondence on: "Neurolymphatic clearance in neurodegenerative disease: Emerging mechanisms and potential translational strategies".JPRAS open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Neurolymphatic dysfunction has been linked to cognitive decline and implicated in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and Parkinson's Disease (PD). Despite its growing recognition, the potential role of pharmacological or surgical neurolymphatic modulation remains poorly understood. Objectives: This review summarizes current evidence on the neurolymphatic system's anatomy, physiology and its involvement in neurodegenerative diseases. It also examines emerging pharmacological and lymphatic reconstructive techniques. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, yielding 187 studies related to the neurolymphatic system. Studies were screened for the following topics: (1) Anatomy and physiology of the neurolymphatic system, (2) The association between neurolymphatic dysfunction and neurodegenerative diseases, (3) Pharmacological and (4) Microsurgical neurolymphatic modulation. Results: Current evidence suggests that the neurolymphatic system facilitates drainage of interstitial and cerebrospinal fluid to the deep cervical lymph nodes. Preclinical models suggest that enhancing their clearance may promote the clearance of neurotoxic proteins and potentially improve cognitive function. Conclusions: Scientific evidence on neurolymphatic modulation in neurodegenerative diseases is scarce. Both pharmacological and microsurgical modulatory techniques remain experimental approaches for neurodegenerative diseases, with a significant potential to improve patients' quality of life. However, further research is warranted to establish their safety, feasibility, and efficacy. The current knowledge gaps underscore the need for a detailed mapping of the neurolymphatic pathways, preclinical evaluation, and translational interdisciplinary trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.