Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41550630›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutical science advances2025

Research progress of 3D printing technology in the field of oral materials.

Khan Rajib Hossain, Dipika Ramdas Kalambhe, M Abdul Jalil, Nusrat Tabassum Farah

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutical science advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Khan Rajib HossainMaterials Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100040, China.
Dipika Ramdas KalambheMaterials Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100040, China.
M Abdul JalilDepartment of Natural Sciences, BGMEA University of Fashion and Technology, Dhaka, 1230, Bangladesh.
Nusrat Tabassum FarahPublic Health and Hospital Administration, National Institute of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of three-dimensional (3D) printing has represented a significant technological breakthrough, exerting a profound influence across various domains of society in recent times. There has been a noticeable shift in the healthcare industry's dominant paradigm of therapeutic interventions, particularly regarding the utilization of 3D printing technology to mend or replace damaged or missing biological components. Adopting cutting-edge technology can significantly enhance the range of applications within the field of oral healthcare. A significant amount of research is being conducted to leverage the substantial potential of 3D printing in oral applications, with a focus on developing customized treatment plans tailored to specific case scenarios. By building specialized implantology from different biological composite materials layer by layer, 3D printing technology precisely restores the anatomical structure of defects in the mouth and maxillofacial region. This review presents a comprehensive discussion on the history and classification of 3D printing technology, as well as the dynamics of biological materials, cells, and bioactive factors utilized in repairing oral and maxillofacial bone defects. Additionally, this review provides an update on the materials commonly used in typical oral healthcare applications and examines future trends and concerns related to material perspectives in oral healthcare management.

Indexed as

3D printingImplantologyOral materialsOrthodonticsProsthodontics

Identifiers

PMID41550630
PMCPMC12709938

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.