Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41550758›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

What makes a scent trigger a memory? A cognitive decomposition of odor-evoked retrieval.

Juliette Greco-Vuilloud, Perrine Ruby, Jane Plailly, Anne-Lise Saive

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Juliette Greco-VuilloudLyfe Research and Innovation Center, Ecully, France.
Perrine RubyPerception, Attention, Memory Team, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, CNRS UMR 5292 - INSERM U1028 - University Lyon1, 69366 Lyon, France.
Jane PlaillyOlfaction: from Coding to Memory Team, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, CNRS UMR 5292 - INSERM U1028 - University Lyon1, 69366 Lyon, France.
Anne-Lise SaiveLyfe Research and Innovation Center, Ecully, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A single scent can unlock vivid memories. This study investigates the factors that make some odors more evocative than others. We examined odor-evoked episodic memory in 106 participants who experienced odors embedded in distinct visuospatial contexts, and whose memory was tested 24-72 h later. The protocol empirically dissociates odor recognition ("I've already smelled this scent") and associative memory ("It evokes a memory") processes. Using machine learning with SHapley Additive exPlanations, we identified distinct predictors for each process. Recognition was driven by emotional strength, especially for unpleasant odors, and the richness of verbal descriptions. Associative memory followed a U-shaped relationship with familiarity and was strongly influenced by semantic distinctiveness-how uniquely each odor was described. Together, these findings reveal that odor memorability depends not only on its emotional salience but also on how specifically it is conceptualized and how familiar we are with it.

Indexed as

Cognitive neuroscienceMachine learningNeuroscience

Identifiers

PMID41550758
PMCPMC12808892

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.